How to unfriend someone on Facebook

All guides

A friends list looks like a record of people you know. Facebook uses it as an audience: every account on it holds permission to read whatever you address to friends, and taking one off is an edit to that permission rather than a verdict on a relationship. Holding those two ideas apart makes the decision much easier.

Which means the interesting question is not how to do it — the control is one menu deep on every device — but what the other person is left with. A good deal of what people expect removal to stop, it does not stop.

Three controls, three different views of you

The middle column is the subject of this page. The heaviest has its own guide, on shutting somebody out entirely, because the consequences there run past a change of audience and into contact itself.

What ends when the connection does

• The link, on both lists. Meta's help entry is explicit that you leave their list as they leave yours. No one-directional version of this exists.
• Their access to anything limited to friends. The substantial one. Facebook decides who a post is for at the moment somebody tries to read it, not when it was written, so years of friends-only material stops resolving for them immediately.
• The subscription, in both directions. Their updates leave your feed and yours leave theirs, which is why this is a heavier answer than it looks to somebody who only wanted a calmer morning.
• The small prompts that assume a connection. Birthday reminders and the nudges Facebook assembles out of a friends list go quiet, and their absence is frequently how the other person works it out.

What carries on afterwards

• Anything set to public. Your name, your current picture and every post you shared with the public stay readable — to them, and to anyone else who wanders past.
• Posts aimed at friends of friends. One surviving mutual friend is enough to keep them inside that audience. It is the route almost everybody forgets.
• Groups the two of you joined. A group grants its own access, so both memberships stand and each of you keeps reading what the other writes there.
• The conversation. A thread belongs to the people in it, so the history stays in both inboxes. Messages from people you are not connected to can still arrive; only where they land changes, and that follows your inbox settings.
• Tags, and pictures of the pair of you. Existing tags survive and an upload belongs to whoever posted it. Removing your own tag is a separate job with a separate outcome.
• Following, where you have left that open. Facebook keeps a distinct setting for who is allowed to follow your public posts, and somebody taken off your friends list can remain a follower under it.

Where the control sits on a computer

1. Open their profile, or your own roster of friends. Both hold the control. A roster suits a clear-out because every name carries one; a profile suits a single decision because you can see whose it is.
2. Use the control attached to the connection itself. The friendship is the thing being edited, so the choice belongs to the button that reports it rather than to anything in your settings.
3. Read the quieter option sitting beside it. The same menu tends to offer a way to stop seeing their posts. That is a different outcome, and for most people it is the one they actually wanted.
4. Confirm, knowing nothing will be announced. Facebook issues no notice. The change is still plain to anybody who checks their own list, so quiet here does not mean invisible.
5. Register what their view of you has become. Your audience settings now treat them as a member of the public: more than nothing, considerably less than a friend.

Both entry points arrive at the same outcome, and they suit different jobs: the roster is efficient when you are working through a backlog of names you no longer recognise, a profile is safer when two people you know are called the same thing. Meta rearranges these surfaces between releases, so read the sequence above as a place to get to rather than a set of buttons to press in order.

Where it sits on a phone

The same pair of entry points exists in the app, reached from their profile or from the friends section of your own. The app usually keeps the roster a level deeper than the website does, and it presents the quieter option in the same menu as the removal, which is worth registering before your thumb arrives. Nothing about the result depends on the device: this is a change to the account, not a preference on one handset.

Why unfollowing is usually the better answer

Nearly every complaint that ends in a removal is a complaint about a feed. Somebody posts constantly, or posts things you would rather not meet at breakfast. Unfollowing answers that exactly: the material stops arriving, every permission they hold stays as it was, and nothing is generated for them to notice. It is also reversible on your own authority, since following again is a tap while rebuilding a friendship needs a request and somebody else's agreement.

Removal, by contrast, is legible. There is no notification, but the evidence sits in plain sight: a name missing from a list people scroll through, a mutual count that has moved, an offer to add a friend where no offer was needed last week. Anybody with a modest list spots it inside a fortnight, and relatives and colleagues spot it fastest.

Removal earns its place when the permission itself is wrong, not when the feed is irritating. An account you cannot place, a name accepted at a conference years ago, somebody who ought not to be looking at photographs of your children: in each of those the problem is what they are allowed to see, and only ending the connection changes it.

Adding them back later

There is no undo, only a fresh request, which they can accept, decline or ignore entirely. Their own setting for who may send them requests can stop yours being offered at all, so a missing option on their profile is usually their choice rather than a fault. Acceptance restores the connection and nothing more ceremonious than that.

One consequence of this is quietly reassuring. Because an audience is worked out as a post is read, everything you had addressed to friends becomes visible to them again the moment they accept. Nothing needed republishing and nothing was lost in the meantime; the material sat where it always was, waiting for the permission to return.

Questions about removing a friend

Will they be able to tell?

Facebook sends them nothing, but anybody who looks can see it. You are gone from their list, your profile offers them a friend request again, and the mutual counts shift.

Can they still send me a message?

Yes. Messaging was never a privilege that came with the connection. What changes is where the message lands, which depends on how your inbox is set to treat people you are not connected to.

Do the old conversations disappear?

No. The thread outlives the connection, on both sides, with its history intact. If you want it gone from your own inbox, delete it there — that is a separate action with no effect on their copy.

Does this untag me from their photographs?

No. Tags and uploads belong to the accounts that made them. Where one picture is the whole reason you are here, remove your tag and ask the owner to take the post down.

Can I clear out several people at once?

Not really. The roster is as close as Facebook gets, putting a control beside every name, but each removal remains its own confirmation. Anything advertising a bulk clear-out wants your login, which is a far worse bargain than the tedium.

Do I stop seeing their posts as well?

Yes, and this is the part people regret. The feed works in both directions, so if peace and quiet was the whole objective, the lighter control delivers it and leaves everything else standing.

A setting, not a verdict

Treat the roster as an audience and the choice gets simpler. Where the problem is what somebody can see, end the connection and accept that the change is discoverable. Where the problem is what you can see, unfollow and say nothing at all. Neither is a message to anybody, and one of them is far easier to walk back.